<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science And Supermodels &#187; education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/category/education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com</link>
	<description>Making the world safe for science, one supermodel at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>KFC wants to hire college students &#8211; NOW being total cockblockers</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2010/09/22/kfc-wants-to-hire-college-students-now-being-total-cockblockers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2010/09/22/kfc-wants-to-hire-college-students-now-being-total-cockblockers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=4182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky Fried Chicken, nee &#8220;KFC&#8221; in one of its many efforts to bolster flagging flags (U.S. same-store sales down 7% in the second quarter, nearly all growth internationally) is still not too busy to hire college students. As long as they are women. And have butts. They want to promote their new Double Down sandwiches [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2010/09/22/kfc-wants-to-hire-college-students-now-being-total-cockblockers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you want to do science in 2009, Denmark is the place to be</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2009/07/21/if-you-want-to-do-science-in-2009-denmark-is-the-place-to-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2009/07/21/if-you-want-to-do-science-in-2009-denmark-is-the-place-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=3523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, there are lots of fine schools in the US. Heck, Texas alone has more world-class universities than all of France. But if Stanford, Caltech or MIT seem so cliched, why not consider Denmark? Unless you are a girl who wants to get by on general hotness, that is. Because as this video, 2nd place [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2009/07/21/if-you-want-to-do-science-in-2009-denmark-is-the-place-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Science Endorsement: Katie Stam, Miss America</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2009/01/26/the-science-endorsement-katie-stam-miss-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2009/01/26/the-science-endorsement-katie-stam-miss-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot chicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the University of Indianapolis, communications major Katie Stam is supposedly known for her scholarship, leadership and volunteer work &#8211; and not her great legs, despite the fact that this is the one thing virtually everyone else on planet Earth knows about her. Why are the students and administrators at U of I so jaw-droppingly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2009/01/26/the-science-endorsement-katie-stam-miss-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please Help Scientists By Participating In National Orgasm Day</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2008/07/27/please-help-scientists-by-participating-in-national-orgasm-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2008/07/27/please-help-scientists-by-participating-in-national-orgasm-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blondes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot chicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orgasms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m taking a moment away from crafting &#8220;Journey To The Center Of The Uterus&#8221;, my opus on reproduction and culture, to discuss something of equal import &#8211; namely, orgasms. It will shock you to know this, but nearly 50% of British women don&#8217;t have orgasms. Are they frigid? No, not at all, as my 1999 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2008/07/27/please-help-scientists-by-participating-in-national-orgasm-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teenage Scientists Have Redefined Sex In Order To Have Less Of It</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/18/teenage-scientists-have-redefined-sex-in-order-to-have-less-of-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/18/teenage-scientists-have-redefined-sex-in-order-to-have-less-of-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blondes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teenage Scientists Have Redefined Sex In Order To Have Less Of It We&#8217;ve talked about this before. Not only do I think kids today are smarter than we ever were, I pretty much can&#8217;t wait for them to run the world. Nothing &#8230; and I mean nothing &#8230; in the corporate world compares to trying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/18/teenage-scientists-have-redefined-sex-in-order-to-have-less-of-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science Determines Scientists Are Smarter Than You</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/04/science-determines-scientists-are-smarter-than-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/04/science-determines-scientists-are-smarter-than-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blondes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot chicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August issue of Scientific American tries to figure out why some people are better at things than other people. This, they contend, will help us teach better. I don&#8217;t know why they bothered. I can answer that question in four words: I am smarter than you.* Now, that isn&#8217;t a value judgment, it&#8217;s just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/04/science-determines-scientists-are-smarter-than-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science Is Not A Business For The Squeamish</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/07/29/science-is-not-a-business-for-the-squeamish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/07/29/science-is-not-a-business-for-the-squeamish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or for the sensitive. To wit, I still haven&#8217;t cracked the top 50 science blogs but I think it&#8217;s mostly because I don&#8217;t shriek about evolution or global warming. There are blogs on that list that haven&#8217;t been updated since April so how many people link to you can be misleading. Science &#8230; real science,not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/07/29/science-is-not-a-business-for-the-squeamish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

