<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Detemines The Discovery Channel Is Bad For Your Relationships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/</link>
	<description>Making the world safe for scientists, one hot girl at a time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oabbdgju</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/#comment-39470</link>
		<dc:creator>Oabbdgju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=120#comment-39470</guid>
		<description>good site dude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good site dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banqgtoc</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/#comment-38202</link>
		<dc:creator>Banqgtoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=120#comment-38202</guid>
		<description>Best Site good looking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best Site good looking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teen</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/#comment-36144</link>
		<dc:creator>teen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=120#comment-36144</guid>
		<description>great work man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great work man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnoBlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnoBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=120#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry guys, but I think Atomic Theory should be the top. It has explained quite a bit about the scientific world, including woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry guys, but I think Atomic Theory should be the top. It has explained quite a bit about the scientific world, including woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief Scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=120#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Pat, great question! But that's actually in the 'Top 100 Greatest Discoveries of Bullshit Science' rather than this list. Warp speed is nestled comfortably between string theory and P.M.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, great question! But that&#8217;s actually in the &#8216;Top 100 Greatest Discoveries of Bullshit Science&#8217; rather than this list. Warp speed is nestled comfortably between string theory and P.M.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Sullivan Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sullivan Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=120#comment-17</guid>
		<description>What about the discovery of warp speed ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the discovery of warp speed ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief Scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=120#comment-16</guid>
		<description>My friend, I am betting that, in our waning years, VIAGRA will be the bestest of all.  

I don't know where calculus ended up ... it wasn't in the top 10.

Darwin's theory was tops.  Yep, it isn't even a LAW but it was good enough to be #1.  I am telling you, it had to be all biology students voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend, I am betting that, in our waning years, VIAGRA will be the bestest of all.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where calculus ended up &#8230; it wasn&#8217;t in the top 10.</p>
<p>Darwin&#8217;s theory was tops.  Yep, it isn&#8217;t even a LAW but it was good enough to be #1.  I am telling you, it had to be all biology students voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unusual Suspect</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/08/28/science-detemines-the-discovery-channel-is-bad-for-your-relationships/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Unusual Suspect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=120#comment-15</guid>
		<description>So who was number 1 anyway?

AND WHERE'S CALCULUS???????

Fine, it's not a scientific discovery per se, but hell, without caculus, we'd still be jacking off to cave paintings instead of following links from ... uh. 

Scrap that.

Oh, and where's the discovery of The Pill? Doesn't that rank as the bestest of them all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who was number 1 anyway?</p>
<p>AND WHERE&#8217;S CALCULUS???????</p>
<p>Fine, it&#8217;s not a scientific discovery per se, but hell, without caculus, we&#8217;d still be jacking off to cave paintings instead of following links from &#8230; uh. </p>
<p>Scrap that.</p>
<p>Oh, and where&#8217;s the discovery of The Pill? Doesn&#8217;t that rank as the bestest of them all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
