<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New James Bond Is A Wuss - But He&#8217;ll Get Naked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/03/05/the-new-james-bond-is-a-wuss-but-hell-get-naked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/03/05/the-new-james-bond-is-a-wuss-but-hell-get-naked/</link>
	<description>Making the world safe for scientists, one hot girl at a time</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Science And Supermodels &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bond. Cash Bond.</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/03/05/the-new-james-bond-is-a-wuss-but-hell-get-naked/comment-page-1/#comment-28143</link>
		<dc:creator>Science And Supermodels &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bond. Cash Bond.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=53#comment-28143</guid>
		<description>[...] Other people echoed my skepticism. I was not the only one to write criticisms that he couldn&#8217;t take a punch or, even worse for James Bond, that he couldn&#8217;t drive an Aston-Martin.But I am here to say, my friends, that sometimes I can be wrong. I should have known that bringing back Martin Campbell, the guy who directed one of the greatest Bond movies of all time would outweigh anything else. And they took Bond back to the basics. I never said Craig wasn&#8217;t a good actor and he certainly did a terrific job here. By the end of the movie he could well be the best Bond of all time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other people echoed my skepticism. I was not the only one to write criticisms that he couldn&#8217;t take a punch or, even worse for James Bond, that he couldn&#8217;t drive an Aston-Martin.But I am here to say, my friends, that sometimes I can be wrong. I should have known that bringing back Martin Campbell, the guy who directed one of the greatest Bond movies of all time would outweigh anything else. And they took Bond back to the basics. I never said Craig wasn&#8217;t a good actor and he certainly did a terrific job here. By the end of the movie he could well be the best Bond of all time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smarterthanyou</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/03/05/the-new-james-bond-is-a-wuss-but-hell-get-naked/comment-page-1/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>smarterthanyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=53#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>YOU want to play Bond?  YOU are a fucking fag, therefore, you aren't qualified for the role.  And the Bond girl in this movie is perfect.  And Halle Berry as a great Bond girl? Are you fucking retarded? She was one of the worst Bond girls there has ever been, in one of the lamest Bond films there has been.  Get with it fag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU want to play Bond?  YOU are a fucking fag, therefore, you aren&#8217;t qualified for the role.  And the Bond girl in this movie is perfect.  And Halle Berry as a great Bond girl? Are you fucking retarded? She was one of the worst Bond girls there has ever been, in one of the lamest Bond films there has been.  Get with it fag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science And Supermodels &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yes, Vagina, There Is A Santa Claus</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/2006/03/05/the-new-james-bond-is-a-wuss-but-hell-get-naked/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Science And Supermodels &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yes, Vagina, There Is A Santa Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceandsupermodels.com/?p=53#comment-719</guid>
		<description>[...] Clearly, I have nothing against vaginas, since I wrote articles talking about how women were using evolution to create two vaginas and enchant twice as many men at the same time and how the new James Bond got that job thanks to the magic of Sienna Miller&#8217;s career-enhancing vagina but I am not completely obsessed with them either. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clearly, I have nothing against vaginas, since I wrote articles talking about how women were using evolution to create two vaginas and enchant twice as many men at the same time and how the new James Bond got that job thanks to the magic of Sienna Miller&#8217;s career-enhancing vagina but I am not completely obsessed with them either. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
